Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Pathway expression scores based on the mean squared rank out-performed the mean rank, as assessed by precision-recall curves for the tissue-species data.
The authors ranked genes by expression level and computed the mean squared rank.
The mean squared rank was chosen based on a survey of statistical approaches for gene set analysis [ 34], and out-performed other summary statistics in a series of classification benchmarks based on tissue-specific pathway expression (see benchmarking section below).
In addition, an identical analysis pipeline was also constructed using the GSEA algorithm, as applied to single samples [ 25], as the initial step, in place of the mean squared rank.
There was also a much greater computational burden associated with running GSEA on 180,000 arrays compared with using the mean squared rank on the same number of assays.
For a pathway, P, of size k, represented in an array by genes G 1, G 2...G n, the pathway expression score, En P), is defined by the mean squared rank E n (P ) = 1 n × ∑ i = 1 n R i 2, where R i is the rank of gene G i in a pathway containing n genes.
Similar(54)
Mean squared error = 0.291011 (regression).
MSE: mean squared prediction error.
Figure 11 shows the disparity maps estimated by the proposed stereo matching system, and Table 3 exhibits the rank and analyzed performances of root mean square (RMS) disparity error, the rank and analysis of average absolute error (Avgerr).
Minimum mean-squared error.
The performance of HMM GMR was verified based on the mean square error and continuous ranked probability score skill scores.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com