Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Payoff reflected the rank order of a bandit's mean spiral length within the block.
Upper right inset box: showing the mapping between mean spiral length and payoff (H for high and L for low) of the four bandits in the example blocks.
Each block used one of three context types that determined the average lengths of the presented spirals (short, medium, long), ensuring that participants had to learn afresh the relationship between mean spiral length and payoff in each block.
For DV's that involved anchoring the reference on the very first trial of a block was set to v prior = 3.75, which reflected the mean spiral length in the experiment given the distributions in Figure 1B.
Inside the box, corresponding to each bandit, the mean spiral length was shown together with the time that had elapsed (presented as a filled pie chart) before participants had made a committing decision.
Although payoffs were fixed, the mapping from payoff to the nominal mean spiral length changed block-by-block, so that bandit payoff was relative to the other spiral lengths observed in any given block.
Similar(53)
(A ) Commitment probability in different contexts (short, medium and long blocks) as a function of mean bandit spiral length for rule-in (top) and rule-out blocks (bottom) and (B ) probability of commitment as a function of trial number, context-type and rule.
The pump consists of a 12 mm diameter spiral disk on which a spiral-channel is machined with heights of 1 or 2 mm, a width of 1 mm and a spiral length (angular span) of 2.5π or 3.5π.
Mean spiral scores were higher at follow-up than at baseline (p<0.001, table 1).
Each respondent's left-handed and right-handed mean spiral scores were summed to generate a sum spiral score which was used for analysis.
This approach precluded fixed strategies such as accepting or rejecting all bandits below or above a single spiral length.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com