Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(3)
CESM was more sensitive than LE alone (94 % vs. 86%%, p <0.025), more specific than LE alone (84%% vs. 63 %, p <0.025) and showed better size estimation (mean size difference 23%% vs. 31%%, p <0.025).
The studies by Guarneri et al. and Lyou et al. found a mean size difference of 1.6 and 6.0 mm, respectively [35, 38].
The mean size difference between the MRI-visible lesion and the index tumor was 1.3 mm.
Similar(57)
Different disk displacement types demonstrated obvious mean size differences.
The multivariate regression results indicate that this shape feature is correlated with mean size differences (evolutionary allometry) and the first diet PC.
Paired t tests demonstrated mean size differences of +1.31 mm (clinical, n = 53), -3.18 mm (mammography, n = 70) and -4.23 mm (US, n = 89).
In order to analyze the likelihood to mate we calculated the body size distance of each pair relative to the mean population size difference, called "distance of pairs" from now on (Equation 1).
The power calculation was based on alpha of 0.05 and expected mean effect size difference between the groups (difference in change between baseline and 3 months follow-up) being at least 1 unit at HAD-scale.
This ~20-bp mean fragment size difference corresponds to the size difference between MNase-protected DNA after reconstitution of Cse4 and H3 left-handed octasomes (Kingston et al. 2011), strongly suggesting that even mild overproduction leads to the formation of octameric particles that are incorporated into the genome.
Moreover, males in the second study were size sorted (reducing the mean maximum size difference within each tank from 40 mm in study 1 to 12 mm in study 2) in order to reduce the potential confounding effect of size on reproductive performance.
We measure the overall interpolation error imposed by our interpolation method in terms of mean body size differences between the synthesized and captured body models.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com