Sentence examples for mean shell length from inspiring English sources

Statistical differences in mean shell length at different stocking densities appeared from day 2, and greater differences occurred with increased culture time.

Abalone juveniles of similar size (mean weight 1.18±0.04 g; mean shell length 18.65±0.18 mm) were distributed in a flow-through system using a completely randomized design with nine treatments and three replicate groups per treatment.

The impacted site presented two main cohorts, C2 (1.31 cm mean shell length, SL) and C3 (2.11 cm SL) both of which also showed a patchy spatial distribution (C2: Moran's I = 0.7 to − 0.72, spatial range 22 to 35 m; inter-patch distance 63 to 90 m; C3: Moran's I = 0.41 to − 0.63, spatial range 36 to 58 m, inter-patch distance not defined).

This study describes slower circumferential growth rates (0.061 mm day−1) of Nautilus individuals which are much smaller (130.7 mm) than those of Saunders' Palau subjects (0.12 mm day−1 and 200 mm mean shell length).

Osprey Reef Nautilus pompilius are the second smallest yet described at a mean shell length of 130.7 mm, flanked on either end by the diminutive Sulu Sea clade of 115.6 mm and northwest Australian specimens, earlier reported as N. repertus, of 240 mm [5] shell length.

The algal concentration measured during a 21-day steady-state experiment with a group of 25 mussels (mean shell length 31.9 ± 1.3 mm) along with the estimated clearance rate using eqn 6 is shown in Fig. 7.

Both the short- and long-term exposure transplants exhibited slower growth rates, shorter mean shell lengths, lower condition indices, and decreased filtration rates.

There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in their mean absolute shell length and width.

Using the mean growth rate and assuming linear growth of 0.0614mm day−1, the estimated time to reach maturity for males and females of mean mature shell length is 16.5 years and 14.5 years respectively.

Male size, on the other hand, was not significantly related to mean mussel shell length (ANOVA: F1,15 = 0.37, P = 0.55).

The number of offspring per nest was significantly correlated with the mean mussel shell length (ANOVA: F1,15 = 5.82, P < 0.03, Fig. 1).