Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Mean sharpness was 3.79 for CZT SPECT vs. 3.26 (p value 0.0001) for analog SPECT, and mean contrast was 3.92 vs. 3.34 (p value < 0.0001) for CZT and analog SPECT, respectively.
Similar(59)
Based on the results, the mean performance for predicting subjective sharpness was clearly higher than that of the state-of-the-art algorithm and test-target sharpness metrics.
Their sharpness was impressive.
The attacking continued but sharpness was elusive for a time.
Image sharpness was compared by measuring the diameter of point targets and directional edge sharpness.
An increase in sharpness was observed for higher writing speeds.
In some cases sharpness was also increased.
The image sharpness was obtained by averaging over the four profiles.
Competitive sharpness is the goal with him.
The sharpness is something I keep in my mind".
It is lean and its sharpness is penetrating.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com