Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
At a thickness of 200 μm, the mean sensitivity was approximately 4 dB and then rises linearly to 11 dB by a thickness of 350 μm, but then decreases linearly to 6 dB by a thickness of 600 μm.
The mean sensitivity was 0.26 ± 0.09 for film and 0.20 ± 0.07 for digitized images (P =.000), with a pronounced decline in the latter in regions of high background density.
Mean sensitivity was 82.12% and mean specificity was 91.88%.
The mean sensitivity was 83% (fig. 1, table 2).
Mean sensitivity was 25.1% in the sessions without CAD and 34.8% in the CAD-assisted sessions.
Mean sensitivity was computed in an interval of false-positive fractions less than 10%.
Similar(48)
Mean sensitivity is a measure of the year-to-year variability in tree-ring widths and is a standard COFECHA metric (Speer 2010).
At a thickness of 200 μm, the mean sensitivity is roughly 10 dB in both groups, then rises linearly to 15 dB by a thickness of 280μm, then decreases linearly to 13 dB by a thickness of 380 μm.
Accuracy of locating biliary leaks was superior with the combination of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC and T2w-MRC (P < 0.05).The mean sensitivities were 79%% vs 59%%, and the mean accuracy rates were 84%% vs 58%% for combined CE-MRC and T2w-MRC vsolele T2w-MRC.
For the farmers, the mean proportion of faecal pools assessed as diarrhoeic was 0.48, the mean proportion of correctly classified faecal pools was 0.84, the mean diagnostic sensitivity was 0.83 and the mean diagnostic specificity was 0.86.
Mean glucose levels were consistent with impaired glucose tolerance, and mean insulin sensitivity was very low.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com