Sentence examples for mean sensitivity for from inspiring English sources

Additional file 1: Chronology statistics (i.e., interseries correlation coefficient and mean sensitivity) for each seed source at each test site location.

However, CCT alone shows a low sensitivity for ischemic stroke detection (sensitivity 27%to64%4%) [29 32] and has a mean sensitivity for early infarction sign detection of 66%20%to87% 87%) with a specificity of 87%56%to100%100%).

To get further insight into the properties of poly-G motifs we calculated the mean sensitivity for runs of identical bases of length one to five, e.g. G, GG,..,GGGGG averaged over all sequence positions of homozygous-present PM-probes (PM-GG, see Figure 13 and also Figure 3).

The mean sensitivity for each variable across all 10 ANNs was calculated and ranked from largest to smallest.

Mean sensitivity for BMP2 was 11 pg/ml and intra- and inter-assay variabilities were 2.6 and 6.3%, respectively.

The mean sensitivity for lesions of ≥10 mm was 86% in group 1 and 97% for group 2 (p = 0.355).

Bruegel et al. 4 reported on mean sensitivities for lesion detection with triggered short-tau inversion recovery (STIR), FSE, and STIR of 72.0%, 69.0%, and 63.4%, respectively.

The sensitivity model consisted of mean sensitivities for film mammography and MRI; mean sensitivity of mammography was for five age groups (Kriege et al, 2006; Kerlikowske et al, 2000), whereas mean sensitivity of MRI was an overall sensitivity, as it was independent of age (Warner et al, 2008).

While quite effective in many types of cancers, FDG-PET has shown a low mean sensitivity of 17.3% for detecting small lymph node metastases in patients with early-stage melanoma cancer [6 8], thus offering limited value in the initial staging of AJCC (American Joint Commission on Cancer) stage I, or stage II melanoma [6, 9, 10].

A high correlation between abnormal DAT binding and a clinical diagnosis of probable DLB has been shown; in a pivotal multicentre study, abnormal scans had a mean sensitivity of 78% for distinguishing clinically probable DLB from AD, with a specificity of 90% for excluding non-DLB.

The crude mean sensitivity of the ITT-C for An.gambiae s.l., Culex spp., and Mansonia spp. relative to ITT-B are summarized in Table 1.