Sentence examples for mean score assessed from inspiring English sources

Interestingly, our data shows that, in this population, the EFGR mean score, assessed using the H-score method previously reported, was significantly higher in tumors with vascular invasion and higher T stage and in tumors with high-grade histology (mainly solid subtype).

The mean scores assessed in our study were slightly higher than those reported in the literature.

For example, the mean conduct problem score assessed by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire [ 42] was 1.50, standard deviation = 1.42 and normative data for UK children aged 5 to 10 years shows a mean of 1.6 and a standard deviation of 1.7.

The mean symptom scores (assessed by patient questionnaires) together with its 95% confidence intervals were plotted to analyse symptomatic improvement with time and according to study group.

Furthermore, their number was directly correlated to the 28-joint count disease activity score and standardized-response mean score used to assess the disease activity in RA patients.

Both plaque index and calculus index are the means of 6 plaque (calculus) scores assessed on 6 tooth surfaces.

Both debris index and calculus index are the means of six debris (calculus) scores assessed on six tooth surfaces: 0 = No debris (calculus); 1 = Debris (calculus) on less than 1/3 of the tooth surface; 2 = Debris (calculus) covering between 1/3 and 2/3; 3 = Debris (calculus) covering more than 2/3.

In contrast, the NPI improved group started at a worse level than the other two groups at baseline (29.8) but improved to a mean score of 18.6 when assessed 3 months later.

Any MD ≥ 10 was considered clinically significant and tested for statistical significance (n.a., not applicable, if MD < 10) Mean score difference (MDs) were assessed with linear mixed-effect models and adjusted for time Charlson Comorbidity Index, neoadjuvant therapy, tumour stage, gender, histology, tumour site and complications.

Older and younger patients reported clinically similar fatigue, dyspnoea and dysphagia over time (MDs < 10 points, not requiring statistical comparison; Table  3).> -wrap-foot>> -wrap-foot> Mean score difference (MDs) were assessed with linear mixed-effect models and adjusted for time Charlson Comorbidity Index, neoadjuvant therapy, tumour stage, gender, histology, tumour site and complications.

For comparison of baseline characteristics, ordinal measures were assessed using the mean score Cochran Mantel Haenszel test, nominal scale measures were assessed using the generalized Cochran Mantel–Haenszel test, and continuous measures were assessed using the t-test.