Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The results of the regression analyses show that the mean scientific performance of approved applicants is higher subsequent to application than the mean performance of rejected applicants.
Similar(59)
Of course, some will argue that shifting the means by which we assess scientific performance is artificial and undesirable.
Q: What metrics do you find useful in tracking the nation's scientific performance?
We examine whether entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia can be reconciled.
The decisions correspond with the applicants' subsequent scientific performance.
This means that approximately one-third of the applicants (39% and 28%) was rejected but later went on to demonstrate the same or greater scientific performance than applicants that were approved.
We checked the association between the selection decisions and the scientific performance of the applicants.
To date, more than thousand different scales exist which aim at measuring scientific performance.
These ratings are by no means scientific.
Here's the disclaimer: This data is by no means scientific.
As described, objective career success mainly means scientific success.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com