Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
Compared to the mean scan time of other clinical fMRI protocols (174 s) a reduction of 62% was achieved.
Differences in mean scan time and cost per scan were also significantly different (P <.0001), with CT being both quicker and less expensive.
In our study, mean scan time was approximately 12 s, which represents a further improvement as compared to a mean scan time of 21 s with 64-slice CT [ 15].
The mean scan time, including the navigator efficiency and arrhythmia rejection for the Cartesian 3DcinePC sequence, was 31 min (range 16 57, median: 30, std: 8).
Similar(55)
Moreover, the mean duration of the surgical procedure was 449.3 min, with pre- and postresection iMRI mean scan times of 22.5 min and 18.5 min, respectively.
For comparison, we use the mean scanning time of 750 msec in [5] for active scanning, that is, the active scan w/o APR in Figure 7.
Simulation environment C++ AP's communication range 200 m Number of vehicles 1000 Number of samples 1000 Mean scanning time (Active) 750 msec Mean scanning time (Passive) 1200 msec Velocity 1 m/sec 55 m/sec Vehicle length 3 6 m Reaction time 0.7 1.5 sec Maximum average deceleration 0.0075 sec2/m Figure 7 Active scan for car-following model.
This is an improvement reducing the average scanning delay per vehicle by approximately 60% regardless of the scanning mode compared to the mean scanning time of 750 msec in [5] for active scanning and 1200 ms for passive scanning.
Total number of passes, mean biopsies diameter, mean glomeruli per specimen, mean operation time, mean scanning time, and mean radiation dose were recorded.
Total number of passes, mean biopsy diameter, mean glomeruli per specimen, mean operation time, mean scanning time, and mean radiation dose were noted.
The mean scanning time was 15 ± 1.5 minutes.The standard MRA study was composed of T1 Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) sequences on the axial, sagittal and coronal oblique planes (TR: 450 ms; TE 20 ms; 3 mm slice, 1.5 mm gap; matrix: ax 200 × 150; cor 176 × 140; sag 228 × 160) and 3D WATS-C FFE sequence (TR: 20 ms; TE 50 ms; 1.2 mm slice, 0 mm gap; matrix 256 × 256).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com