Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The mean scale efficiency scores, which is in the range of 50 and 100%, changed slightly from 0.925 in 1998 to 0.902 in 2010.
This resulted in a 5.1% reduction of mean scale efficiency in NHS facilities, which was now statistically significantly different (and lower) from the mean scale efficiency of the IKA centers.
Similar(58)
I mean scale of 1-100.
"Community participation means scale," Wales said.
It still meant scaling back some plans.
The mean scores for technical and scale efficiency were 0.57 (SD = 0.32) and 0.95 (SD = 0.11) respectively.
Seven (41%) of the hospitals had a scale efficiency (SE) of 100%, which means that they had the most productive size for that particular input-output mix.
The industrial frontier production function estimated the return to scale and the scale efficiency in terms of the mean value of industrial input factors, therefore, the return to scale and scale efficiency we discussed represented the average situation of an industry.
This implies that the relatively low scale efficiency of small and remote facilities increased the mean score of the entire sample in the previous analysis, since larger units were assigned higher scores (because DEA compares units in relation to peers).
This means that CRS technical efficiency of a firm can be decomposed into pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency (SE).
The VRS technical and scale efficiency scores for individual health posts are given in Table 2. Overall, the mean efficiency scores for TE and SE were 0.57 (SD = 0.32) and 0.95 (SD = 0.11) respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com