Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Unlike crystalline and amorphous oxide substrates, the mean roughness parameter, Ra, of the MgF2 substrate is large.
We conclude that the arithmetic mean roughness parameter is suitable for relating bare laminate surface roughness to final paint quality with roughness thresholds being developed.
Similar(58)
The mean roughness parameters, Ra, from 1 × 1 μm scans are (a) 0.97 and (b) 2.45 nm, respectively.
The mean roughness parameters Sq and Sa on PC substrate were respectively Sq/nm=8.9 ± 3.3 and Sa/nm=7.0 ± 2.7.
The mean roughness parameters, R a, from 1 μm × 1 μm scans are (a) 0.224 nm and (b) 0.089 nm, respectively.
The mean roughness parameters, R a, from 1 μm × 1 μm scans are 0.224 nm (on SiO2) and 0.089 nm (on Eagle 2000™ glass).
Seven specimens from each group were scanned and evaluated for the average roughness parameter, each specimen was scanned five times, and the mean was calculated in µm.
At the same time the root mean square surface roughness parameter increases from 520.7 nm to 564.6 nm.
The increase of the mean square surface roughness parameter Rq while transforming from a glassy to a fully crystallized state can be caused by concurrent growth of Ni3Nb and Ni6Nb7 bulk phases.
Careful analysis of the roughness parameters, mean roughness (Ra) and RMS roughness (Rq) reveals that the roughness is not monotonically increasing as a function of irradiation energy; instead, a reduction in the roughness is found at 1.5 keV as indicated in Figure 2 - a sign of sputtering completion of FLG first layer at this irradiation energy.
It was found that the role of the binding matrix strength and of the type of aggregate, in the interface strength, is dependent of the roughness of the substrate; the coefficients of cohesion and friction exhibited a good correlation with the roughness parameter "mean peak high", Rpm, being the cohesion also influenced by the matrix strength of the added concrete.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com