Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
INT reduced the adjusted mean risk for the development of DR by 76% and slowed progression of DR by 54% compared with CON.
Both Framingham equations overestimate mean risk for all age groups for men and overestimate mean risk for women in all except the 65-69 and 70-74 year age groups, in which it underestimates risk, most notably in patients aged 70-74 years. 70-74 years
The mean risk for this scenario was reduced to 2 × 10−3, 2 × 10−5, and 5 × 10−8, for 5, 15, and 30 m of saturated soil, respectively.
Multiple regression models were applied to estimate age- and gender adjusted 10-year mean risk for cases with complete data and for all cases after imputation and pooling of the original and imputed data sets.
We found the same general relationships between the different measures and the mean risk when the alternative cutpoints defining high risk of 10%and50%0% were applied.Figure 6 displays the difference in Net Benefit plotted against the mean risk for various combinations of baseline model and new predictor.
Similar(54)
There has been talk of a "masochism strategy", but masochism begins at home – with cuts that mean risks for politicians, not for others.
When there is sufficient evidence in the data to create a group of areas with higher risk, the posterior mean risks for the areas in this group are well estimated and close to the simulated values.
Means with 95% CI for the difference *p < 0.001 for difference in mean risk scores for males/females on CVM, versus males/females not on CVM.
The mean risk scores for T2DM, IGR and NGR were 4.45, 4.24 and 3.99, respectively (P<0.0001) after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, diabetes family history, current smoking and alcohol intake in the case-control analysis.
The mean risk score for eligible participants was 15.7 equating to a one in three chance of developing type 2 diabetes during the following 10 years [ 16].
Loss of TOLL 11 function incurred a mean risk ratio for oocyst infection of 1.71 (comparison of infected and uninfected categories; individual replicates = 1.26, 1.81, 2.08 respectively).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com