Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
The extrapolation of mean ring width to missing radius generally overestimates the number of missing rings (by up to 27.5% of actual age) and the level of overestimation increases with decreasing partial core length, while the application of basal area increment largely underestimates the age estimation (by up to 20.5%).
After a cambial age of 8 years, mean ring width was not significantly different between taxa.
Differences in mean ring width between Macrocarpa and Leyland were not significant, while differences in mean ring width between Lusitanica and Macrocarpa were significant only for rings 3 (p = 0.03) and 5 (p = 0.04).
In years 2 8 of growth, mean ring width of Lusitanica was significantly greater than that of Leyland.
Mean ring width initially increased for the majority of the cypress trees, reaching a peak at a cambial age of 2 to 3 years.
Remarkable is a higher tree age at Schlossberg (indicated by the mean segment length: 236 versus 200 years), but lower mean ring width.
Similar(48)
Mean ring widths varied from 0.55 to 3.35 mm, with highest values observed at Bayreuth very likely resulting from a steady water supply during growing season.
The modification entailed adding the sum of the actual mean ring widths of the first two rings (totalling 18 mm for Leyland and 24 mm for Lusitanica and Macrocarpa) to the cumulative sum obtained from the ring-width models.
In these cases, the mean year of death of the three largest and three smallest trees nearest in diameter, of the same class (snag or lying log), and at the same plot as an excessively decomposed tree was used as an estimate of its year of death, and the mean ring widths of these same trees were used as an estimate of its growth.
Annual variation in ring width (climatic sensitivity) showed significant but somewhat weaker effects of site climate and provenance climate than average ring width.
These could be obtained from outerwood cores taken from a sample of trees, in which case the mean ring number and ring width of the density sample would be used.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com