Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
Cummins and Midlo (1943) have established that females do have higher mean ridge count (23.4) than males (20.7).
But certain authors also reported negative results regarding this hypothesis, According to Reddy (1975), the mean ridge count for males is 13.41 and that of female are 12.04.
But according to Acree et al., the mean ridge count for male is 11.14 and that of female is 13.32 in Caucasian population.
In the past too many studies have been conducted on ridge count by various scientists like Cummins and Midlo to establish that females do have higher mean ridge count.
The mean ridge count in the left hand of cases was 12.4 whereas it was 19.6 in the controls.
The mean ridge count in the right hand of cases was 12.4 whereas it was 18.4 in the controls.
Similar(51)
Frequencies for different types of patterns and mean ridge density were also determined.
Cordones: it must mean ridges!
The results synchronize with the present study as higher ridge count was found in females (23.4) than males (20.7).
Here again they found that the mean ridge density in male is more than female.
Based on clinical ridge width dimension measurements, a mean ridge width gain of 1.4 and 2.6 mm were calculated for the test and the control group, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com