Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
The mean retinal sensitivity within the central 10° was measured with a fundus-related microperimeter (MP1, Nidek, Gamagori, Japan).
The mean retinal sensitivity increased from 0.3 dB before treatment (Figure 3C) to 4.1 dB after treatment (Figure 3D).
Mean retinal sensitivity within the central 10° in microperimetry increases from 0.3 dB before treatment to 4.1 dB.
The main outcome measure was mean retinal sensitivity.
Mean retinal sensitivity (in dB) was lower after peeling: 9.80±2.35 dB with peeling versus 13.19±2.92 without (p=0.0209).
Mean retinal sensitivity was calculated from the sensitivity for each of nine subfields on the retinal map generated by OCT.
Similar(52)
The retinal sensitivity threshold map was automatically registered to the color fundus photo, and the overall average retinal sensitivity was calculated (Fig. 2).
In contrast, analysis of the mean change in paracentral retinal sensitivity from baseline to 12 months using microperimetry revealed functional loss in the study eye (−2.3 dB; SD 2.4; p = 0.01) and in the fellow eye (−1.3 dB; SD 1.6; p = 0.03).
We expressed all the variables as mean ± SD when appropriate, taking into account the average of the retinal sensitivity values at the various points of analysis.
Spearman's correlation tests were used to establish correlation between mean cone packing density and retinal sensitivity at different quadrants.
We calculated the mean values for the two retinal sensitivity tests to light in both mesopic and scotopic conditions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com