Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
We preferred this option over option 3a because option 3a is based on predicted mean response, whereas option 3b is based on observed mean response.
Similar(59)
Of note, QAP musicians showed significantly faster mean response time for correct tonal classification compared with correct pitch naming, whereas the reverse was true for AP musicians (F1,22 = 9.093, P < 0.01, see Fig. 4 a ).
The mean response for attitude for the white ethnic group was 1.88 (Table 3) whereas, the mean response for the non-white group was 2.13; the white ethnic group were more inclined to agree with vaccination.
The naive pooled approach produces imprecise estimates of mean responses and cannot provide estimates of between-subject variability (BSV), whereas the two-step approach produces good estimates of mean response but biased and imprecise estimates of BSV.
Across the recorded populations, the mean response of neurons from imprinted chicks to AIS was greater than to ANO whereas the mean response of neurons from naïve chicks to AIS was weaker than to ANO (Fig. 2b) (interaction between group and stimulus: F1, 155 = 5.86, P = 0.017).
Mean response time.
Results: The mean response rate was 32%.
The mean response was 8.11±5 mm.
Mean response rates were 62%.
Bottom: mean response to standard tones.
Top: mean response to deviant tones.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com