Sentence examples for mean response strength from inspiring English sources

Mean response strength values were log-transformed in order to meet the standard assumptions of normality of residuals and homogeneity of variances.

To distinguish between these two explanations, we compared response strength of common calls to that of rare calls by calculating the ratio of mean response strength of rare calls to that of common calls.

The linear discriminant function with the standardized weights is then L = a 1 * R 1 + a 2 * R 2 + … + a p * R p, where R is the response strength minus the mean response strength divided by the SD (z-score).

We used mean LFP and AMUA response strengths as dependent variables, which were obtained for each bird and treatment level by averaging over the repeated measurements taken during the trial.

Equivalently, Fig. 6F shows the mean percentage increase in maximum response strength for ILD functions that exhibited a significant increase in maximum response strength.

Response strength to taps at the target site were, on average, 140% of the response strength before learning.

For ILD functions that showed a significant decrease in maximum response strength, Fig. 6E shows the mean percentage decrease in maximum response strength compared with the no-noise condition at each SNR for all such ILD functions.

To examine potential order effects a 2 (Order of SOA) × (2) (SOA) × (2) (Prime Strength) × (2) (Congruence) ANOVA of mean response latencies was conducted.

Fig. 1 displays the mean response of the maximum participation rate achieved during a simulation history to the strength of suppression.

That is, certain individuals 'responded' to the resistance training stimulus by exhibiting gains in strength and muscle mass that were sustantially greater than the group mean response despite differences between the groups' post-exercise nutrition.

To statistically compare the response strength to calls that had different probabilities (common/rare) or occurred in different rate sequences, we calculated the mean of the AMUA signal and the mean power of the LFP signal for individual call events at each site during a response episode of 293 ms (see Results) from the onset of the call.