Sentence examples for mean relative weight from inspiring English sources

Significant relationships were observed between P5 and P10 results for mean length-at-age (MLA), coefficients of variation associated with MLA (CV), Von Bertlanffy growth constants (K), mean relative weight for stock-length and greater fish (Wr-S), and CV values associated with Wr-S.

The mean relative weight for a STEMI patient treated in the years 2002, 2005 and 2008 was determined.

An increase of approximately 10% of the mean relative weight respectively mean reimbursement for a network area STEMI patient from 2002 to 2008 seems to be attributable to network effects.

The comparison of the mean reimbursement for a STEMI patient in 2005 derived from the model (mean relative weight multiplied with the real base rate 2005) with the real reimbursement served as a quality indicator of the relative weight model.

Afterwards the mean relative weight was multiplied with the real base rate (€2855) valid for the network area in 2005 leading to a standardized mean reimbursement received for a STEMI patient in the network area in the respective years.

An increase of the mean relative weight from 2002 to 2005 respectively 2008 in patient cohorts with comparable baseline characteristics should be an appropriate indicator for the change in medical care driven by the network organization.

No significant differences were observed in the mean relative weights of adipose tissue among the groups.

As a quality indicator for the top down source of change analysis a virtual base rate was calculated (mean standardized reimbursement divided by mean modelled relative weight 2005) and compared to the real base rate 2005.

In regard to mean relative organ weights, the weight of the liver of the male animals of the SiO2·naked test group was increased and the hearts of the female animals of the BaSO4 test group were decreased (Table  8).

The mean relative liver weight (g/100 g body weight) of AOM alone group was also significantly lower than that of none treatment group (P < 0.05).

Importantly, this therapy did not have a significant effect on body weight compared with the vehicle group (mean relative body weight for vehicle versus KPT-330 cohorts: 106% and 105% body weight compared with their mean starting weight, respectively).