Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
The remaining subjects had a mean rejection rate of 42%.
This limit, which may be considered conservative in light of the experimental design, resulted in a mean rejection rate of 15% of trials.
Mean rejection rate was 80.0% (standard deviation 23.0%), but there was a strong correlation between the raw and refined matrices (Mantel test; 10 000 iterations, correlation = 0.860, P < 0.001).
Similar(56)
Mean recognition rate for familiar faces used in the RS experiment was 93.3% (SE = 2.8); mean correct rejection rate for unfamiliar faces was 97.2% (SE = 1.0).
The mean correct rejection rate for the New pairs was 80.2% (NNR and NNF conditions).
The average artifact rejection rate was around 18% (range = 3%44%44%).
The correct match rate of each grade, mean correct match rate, false rejection rate (FRR), and false acceptance rate (FAR) indices were used for performance evaluation.
Each value in the table is the mean of the rejection rates for each of the 32 combinations of amount of skewness and standard deviation ratios.
In a study involving 15 small societies, Henrich et al. [90] reported mean offers ranging from 26 percent to 58 percent with rejection rate for low offers of 20 percent or less ranging from zero to 100 percent.
Only those genes of the K ('transcription') category present in the 'universal' and 'essential' core data sets showed a significantly lower rejection rate than the mean of their corresponding data sets.
However, since 16S-probes were less negatively influenced by the "position of label" effect and showed the lowest rejection rate and the highest mean signal intensity, 16S is more suitable for DNA microarray probe design than cty b and COI.
More suggestions(16)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com