Suggestions(5)
Exact(5)
In particular, the area above each curve is an interesting measure of the goodness of the method, and it also represents the mean recall score over all the ASes.
The mean recall score from the 28 tests performed in the same environment was 12.96 +/− 3.93 (mean, SD).
The mean recall score from the 28 tests performed in the same environment to the learning episode was 12.96 +/− 3.93 (mean, SD).
The mean recall score from the 28 tests performed in an alternative environment to the learning episode was 13.5 +/− 5.31 mean, SD), indicating that changing the recall environment from the learning environment does not cause any statistical difference (p=0.58).
The mean recall score from the 28 tests performed in an alternative environment to the learning episode was 13.5 +/− 5.31 mean, SD), indicating that changing the recall environment from the learning environment does not cause a statistically significant difference (p=0.581).
Similar(55)
The mean recall scores for the four word lists were 12.0, 14.2, 12.6, 12.6 respectively.
The mean recall scores for each group are depicted in Figure 1.
The average recall score of participants who learned and recalled in the tutorial room was 13.0 +/− 3.84 (mean, SD).
The average recall score of participants who learnt and recalled in the operating theatre was 12.92 +/− 4.18 (mean, SD), representing no significant difference between the two environments for learning (p=0.4792).
Here our sample had a mean delayed 10-word recall score of 5.6 (SD 1.9).
Having a low recall score means the classifier is conservative.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com