Sentence examples for mean recall performance from inspiring English sources

To test for the effects of Sleep and Interference on recall, we performed a two-way, mixed-effects ANOVA (N = 45) using Sleep v. Wake and Interference v. No-Interference as predictors, and mean recall performance of the B word as the outcome measure.

The mean number of correctly recalled object place associations was 1.74 (s.d. 0.78), significantly smaller than the subject's recall performance (mean recalled associations is calculated as 3.31 (s.d. 1.07)).

As shown in the above analysis, DB consistently achieves the best F1-score and recall performance, but has slightly worse mean breakpoint mismatch performance than that of CREST, even when the data availability is low (i.e., lower coverage levels).

Second, the mean object distance, D, was not significantly correlated to the subject's recall performance (r = −0.0775, p = 0.1458; n.s).. D is an important parameter for the structure of the associative network, while this result shows that the object arrangement is not a dominant factor in the prediction of subsequent recall.

The mean recall was 98.1%.

The TLE group also exhibited worse 30-min recall performance on a standardised test of story recall.

Bottom: ESC configuration for the best recall performance.

Mean recall percentages for linguistic phenomena detection w.r.t.

Minimum recall number 57 Minimum recall percentage 90.5% Maximum recall number 63 Maximum recall percentage 100% Recall number standard deviation 1.3 Mean recall number 60.4 Mean recall percentage 95.9% Mean recall percentage interval 93.8%–97.9% Table 9 Correlation coefficients between the perceptual dimensions of study A1 and psychoacoustic descriptors.

Factors that may predict better recall performance were also explored.

Results of mean student performance for the free recall essay pre- and post-tests showed improved scores for the post-test.