Suggestions(5)
Exact(5)
A flattened bell-shaped seasonal function determines the daily mean rain volume (DMR), i.e., the mean rain volume for a given day of the year averaged for rainy days across years.
In summary, increasing daily mean rain volume and, more strongly, mean annual precipitation both increased peak shoot mass, but their relative effects generally decreased from the semiarid or dry Mediterranean to more arid or more mesic regions.
The change of daily rain pattern was achieved by increasing the seasonal amplitude of daily mean rain volume (DMR) by -20%, -10%, 0%, 10%, and 20% in the ReGen time series generator [ 20].
I simulated the change of stochastic daily rain patterns by increasing the seasonal amplitude of daily mean rain volume (DMR) matched by a decrease in the seasonal occurrence of rainy days so that the mean annual volume remained unchanged.
I assessed the importance of intra-annual rainfall distribution on soil moisture, seedling density, peak shoot mass, and population persistence by varying independently the amplitude of daily mean rain volume (DMR) and the mean annual precipitation (MAP) and comparing their relative effects.
Similar(55)
I manipulated daily rainfall variability by changing the daily mean rain (DMR, rain volume on rainy days averaged across years for each day of the year) by ± 20%.
The DMR for a given rainy day of the year is used as the mean of a random negative exponential distribution from which the rain volume on that day is drawn.
The projected increase in rain volume is negligible for most of Ireland thus the Karst effect (clean rain dissolution) is unlikely to increase.
I tried to get Poncho to clarify — did "wet" mean rain was coming, then?
The rain volume breaking point from which CSO structures started to overflow ranged from 0.6 mm to 2.8 mm.
Increasing DMR prolongs intervals between rains, reduces the contribution of days with light rains and increases the contribution of rainstorms to the annual rain volume [ 20].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com