Sentence examples for mean preferences from inspiring English sources

Figure 8 shows the global mean preferences.

For the analyses that used four-day mean preferences for each hydrolysate series, the fifth day's data was used in three cases when the individuals did not interact with the stimuli on one of the earlier days and consequently were missing a preference score for a day.

Inferences of the posterior mean preferences π r, a were made separately for each replicate of the experiment, and the correlations among these inferences from different replicates are in Figure 6.

We first mapped the sequence preferences value to each experimentally determined nucleosome, and next calculated the mean preferences for all nucleosomal-long sequences (except the one bound by the nucleosome) that are between the right end of its previous adjacent nucleosome and the left end of its next adjacent nucleosome.

We should mention that methods other than cost-benefit or cost-utility analysis have been proposed for choosing between alternatives – for example, by aggregating mean preferences across different attributes (outcomes) of the decision – so called multi-criteria decision-making [ 36, 37].

The three single presentation formats were the least preferred with mean preference scores of 0.10 for the augmented bar chart, 0.07 for the flow diagram, and 0.04 for the augmented icon display.

The combined augmented icon display + bar chart was second most preferred with a mean preference score of 0.22.

The most preferred format was the combined augmented bar chart + flow diagram (mean preference score 0.43) followed by the combined augmented icon + augmented bar chart format (mean preference score 0.22).

Figure 3 depicts the mean preference scores for all four conditions.

The mean Preference and Coexistence scores for each animal were calculated.

The mean Preference and Coexistence scores of each animal were strongly positively correlated (Pearson's r = 0.90, p < 0.001).