Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The mean predicted mortalities were respectively 72%, 68%, and 69% (p = 0.91).
The SAPS 2 mean predicted mortalities for patients with score <39.5 and ≥ 39.5 were 6.31 ± 0.48% and 48.7 ± 7.5%, respectively.
The mean predicted mortalities based on the SAPS3 score were respectively 72%, 68%, and 69% (p = 0.91) [ 4].
Similar(57)
Baeline data for these patients was as follows: 58.9 % male, mean age 57.4 +/− 0.9 years, mean APACHE-II score 19.7 +/− 0.5, mean predicted mortality 37 +/− 1.5 %, mean length of stay 5.0 +/− 0. days and mortality of 33%%.
The SAPS II score demonstrated the largest difference between the groups with the median score and mean predicted mortality being 38%and29.4%4% in the failed NIPPV group versus 46.5% and 41.6% in the primarily intubated group (p < 0.001).
Mean predicted mortality using the logarithmic CASUS score at the onset of IFI was 59%.
were 7.6 ± 6.1 and 8.6 ± 7, with derived mean predicted mortality, respectively, of 8.63% and 9.86%.
The mean APACHE II score on admission was 25.5 (SD = 8.98) with a mean predicted mortality of 0.48 (SD = 0.26).
The mean APACHE II score was 29.6 (APACHE II, 22 to 35), with a mean predicted mortality of 72%40%0% to 82%).
The mean predicted mortality assessed by the simplified acute physiology score 3 (SAPS-3) and the Charlson comorbidity index were similar in both groups: intervention and control respectively, 43.1 (±13.1) vs. 42.8 (±12.9), p = 0.66 and 1.91 (±2.1) vs. 1.90 (±2.2), p = 0.97.
The APACHE II score mean was 9.7 ± 5.1, corresponding to the mean of predicted mortality of 14.0 ± 10.7%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com