Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Similar(60)
The mean pre-value for resident hand bacteria before application of the reference alcohol was 4.41 ± 0.79 log10 CFU.
There was no significant difference between the mean pre-values for the different hand sizes (p = 0.540, ANOVA; range of means: 4.25 ± 0.95 for glove size 9, 4.67 ± 0.66 for glove size 8.5).
Pre- and postprandial measurements from SMBG (HemoCue) were used to calculate mean pre- and postprandial BG, as well as pre- and post-breakfast, lunch and dinner values.
In transplant recipients mean pre-surgical EA values were significantly higher than controls (0.21 versus 0.5, P = 0.001) and further increased upon graft reperfusion in orthotopic liver transplants (P = 0.018).
In order to compare the introductory students (beginners) to students enrolled in the volcanology course (novices), we compared the mean pre MMM values for both populations.
Effect-sizes (ESs) were calculated as [ 24]: (1) E S = M post − M pre S D pre where Mpre is the mean pre-operative value, Mpost the mean post-operative value, and SDpre the pre-operative standard-deviation.
Regarding diurnal IOP variation, the mean pre-dilation value was 2.60 ± 1.14 mmHg, and the mean post-dilation value was 4.45 ± 2.01 mmHg.
When combining the colloid groups evaluated in the present study, the mean pre-treatment COP value was 11 mmHg and post-treatment was 13.2 mmHg.
Table 4 demonstrates the mean pre and post-operative biomarker values throughout the first 5 days for all subjects adjudicated to either ATN or PRA.
Titration of bolus insulin (IAsp) aimed to achieve a pre-meal PG target of 4 5 mmol/L at the following meal; hence, the breakfast bolus dose was titrated based on mean pre-lunch PG values, the lunch bolus dose was titrated based on mean pre-dinner PG values, and the dinner bolus dose was titrated based on the mean bedtime PG values.
The mean pre- and post-chemotherapy standard uptake value (SUV) were 7.5 and 3.9, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com