Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Mean positive rates ± SD from three different T-cell lines are shown.
Similar(59)
Five clips are given a mean positive rating and seven a mean negative rating.
In a database with results from 1128 hospitals and 567,703 hospital staff respondents reported by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the mean positive response rates at the unit and hospital level were 64.7% and 58.3% respectively, and values outside ±5% were judged as statistically significant [ 28].
Table 2 showed that the positive response rate for the 10 patient safety culture dimensions ranged from 45% to 88%, the mean positive response rate was 65%.
In our study, the percentage of positive responses for the 11 patient safety culture dimensions ranged from 50%to88%8%, and the mean positive response rate was 71%.
Overall, the mean positive response rate for the 12 patient safety culture dimensions of the HSOPSC survey was 64%, slightly higher than the AHRQ data (61%).
C1 The numbers meant positive news for the bond market, signaling that interest rates will rise more slowly.
This plot reveals that mean false positive rates were well controlled (under the 5% nominal rate) except when item difficulty fell below −2.5 logits.
The mean annual positive rate has been reasonably stable at 25.4% (standard deviation, 8.1%; range, 8.9-38.1%).
The labels of the nodes correspond to gene names and the color of the edges visualizes the mean true positive rate (T P R ¯ ) of the corresponding edges with the color code: black edges, 1 ≥ T P R ¯ > 0.75, blue edges, 0.75 ≥ T P R ¯ > 0.5, green edges, 0.5 ≥ T P R ¯ > 0.25, and red edges, 0.25 ≥ T P R ¯ ≥ 0.0.
This random division into training and test datasets was then repeated 10 times to obtain the mean sensitivity (true positive rate) and mean specificity (true negative rate) for the discriminant model and mean MSE (mean square error) and mean R (fraction of variance in p63 occupancy explained by the model) for the regression model.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com