Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(4)
For the in-scanner tonal classification task mean performance accuracy (scored out of 54) was similarly high for the AP, QAP, and RP groups, supporting the utility of this RP functional imaging task (AP = 50.67 ± 6.33; QAP = 50.83 ± 6.75; RP = 53.42 ± 1.24, F2,33 = 0.981, P > 0.05).
The horizontal line indicates mean performance accuracy at the site.
The area between this curve and the mean performance accuracy is a measure of performance fluctuation over the microstimulation session: if performance stayed close to average all the way through the session this area would be very small, whereas if performance fluctuated greatly this area would be large as the smoothed performance line moves away from the mean.
To evaluate this, performance accuracy on threat trials at lag 2 (which is within the temporal domain of the AB) was compared with mean performance accuracy on threat trials averaged across lags 5, 6, 8 and 9 (lags not within the temporal domain of the AB).
Similar(56)
Fig. 3 Experiment 2, mean performance thresholds (blur level or noise level at which participants achieved 75% accuracy) for older and younger participants.
That means performance is now critical again?
We found that performance accuracy increased and mean response times decreased in all groups during the task.
We found that subjective ratings of fatigue increased, performance accuracy increased, and mean response times decreased during the task in all groups.
The mean performance and standard deviations for the voted accuracies on proteins are shown in Figure 7.
Results were analyzed in point accuracy (including absolute and relative differences), rate-of-change accuracy, and sensor reliability (including variation around mean performance and data reporting percentage).
Smoothed performance accuracy fluctuates above and below this mean, perhaps reflecting fluctuations in task engagement.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com