Sentence examples for mean percent time from inspiring English sources

During the loop towards the north which lasted from late February to mid April (Fig. 1), this shark spent a mean percent time at the surface of 52.2±21.0% including 14.5% of days with a mean percent time at the surface of 75.1±15.1%.

Mean percent time with INR in therapeutic range was 67%%; INR <2.0 was 19 % and INR >3.0 was 14%%.

Mean ± SD are used to describe anthropometric measures and mean percent time in MVPA and percent time spent sedentary.

Differences in anthropometric measures, mean percent time in MVPA and percent time spent sedentary between age and gender groups were tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

*Significant difference between age groups #Significant difference between genders within both age groups In 9-year-olds, outdoor plafterter school was significantly related to a higher mean percent time in MVPA (P < 0.01; effect size [ηp] = 0.016).

Univariate general linear models were used to examine the association of different correlates (mode of transportation, outdoor play after school, participation in sport clubs, and TV viewing) on mean percent time in MVPA and percent time sedentary, respectively.

The mean percent work time missed has been reported to be 5.0 for people with asthma [ 18], 4.4 for people with IBS [ 13], 9.0 for people with AS [ 14] and 18.3 for people with Crohn's disease [ 15], respectively, compared with 8.7 for people with RA in our study population.

Specifically, certain communities, e.g. Carex and Eremochloa ophiuroides, are able to survive a wide variety of mean water depth and percent time inundated, while others, like Carex Polygonum criopolitanum, are found to be relatively sensitive to hydrological conditions.

Stability was judged by determining the mean percent difference from the time-zero samples.

Mean percent correct and reaction times were analyzed for each empathy task using repeated-measures ANOVAs with emotion as within-subject factor and group (FO vs. LU) as between-subject factors.

There was no effect of time on mean percent length regenerated for all comparisons among 14, 21 and 28 days (Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA; H = 5.25, df = 2, p>0.07).