Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02001.019 The top or bottom strand location of the lesions differentially affected their mutagenic effect: repair of top strand T/Gs generated ∼fourfold more mutated episomes than the 0 MM control (respective mean percent mutation frequency 0.107 vs 0.025).
Similar(59)
Mean percent error.
Mean percent difference is −3.2%%.
The mean percent reductions (efficiency of Kiln) were 21 69%.
Columns represent mean percent mortality ± standard error (n = 4).
Mean percent stability (100.83) was well within accepted limit (90 110%%).
Equations (1) and (2) are used to calculate the mean absolute percent error and the mean percent error.
The mean percent range error is found to be 4.7%, and the largest percent error is 4.97%.
TZM-bl inhibition was measured as mean percent reduction compared to control.
The distances are based on the mean percent difference in cognacy, using the 200 Swadesh words.
Distributions were first analyzed using uncorrected response magnitude (mean percent signal change).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com