Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Columns represent mean percent mortality ± standard error (n = 4).
Individually, Mac-2 and Mac-5 resulted in reductions of mean percent mortality of 19.6% and 22.5%, respectively, suggesting an additive effect in genotypes carrying both favorable alleles.
The Mac-2/ Mac-5 combination resulted in a 65.6% reduction in mean percent mortality based on 2006 data and 58.5% for the 2007 data.
The presence of these two QTLs resulted in a doubling in reduction of Macrophomina-induced mean percent mortality compared to the presence of either QTL individually.
Percent reductions for the pair-wise combinations ranged from -5.8 to 47.6% with six combinations resulting in a reduction of mean percent mortality greater than 40% (Table 5).
Five of the six combinations had QTL Mac-7 in common and these ranged from 42.8% to 47.6% reduction in mean percent mortality.
Similar(50)
In general, mean percent mortalities for the null genotypes were higher than genotypes with favorable alleles.
Statistical analyses were performed to compare the average percent mortalities by ANOVA and Tukey's means comparison analysis using the SigmaStat® software vs. 3.1 (Systat Inc., San Jose, California, 2004).
This means that percent mortality of Capitella sp. C increased with increase in the concentrations of the detergents tested over the assay period.
Class-specific means of percent mortality and standard errors were calculated for each genotypic class.
The results are presented as mean percent changes in daily mortality [with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] associated with an interquartile range (IQR) increase in size-fractionated PNCs.
More suggestions(16)
mean hospital mortality
mean percent emphysema
mean percent change
mean percent identity
mean percent fat
mean percent difference
mean percent improvement
mean percent error
mean percent blood
mean trial mortality
mean percent density
mean percent increase
mean percent dehydration
mean crude mortality
mean percent energy
mean percent recovery
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com