Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
The mean penetration of water is very low and the groundwater is very salty.
The small microspheres (~30 μm in diameter), loaded with Y, preferentially lodge within the tumor microvasculature, delivering high-energy β-radiation over a limited range (mean penetration of radiation into tissues, 2.4 mm), thereby confining the tumoricidal dose (>70 Gy) to the immediate proximity of the tumor and sparing the normal liver parenchyma [ 2].
Similar(57)
The mean penetration depth of diffusely reflected photons is dependent on the arrival time of photons, but not on the source detector distance.
It is also demonstrated that the mean penetration resistance of concrete materials with unconfined compressive strengths ranging from 75 MPa to 150 MPa is almost the same which may have serious implication for the design of concrete targets against projectile penetration.
The probe source and detector separation is 28 mm, from which we estimate a mean penetration depth of approximately 10 mm in the tissue.
Additionally, for each measurement the condition ∂τ/∂ψ = 0 is here fulfilled and one dataset corresponds strictly to a specific mean penetration depth τ independent of the tilt angle ψ.
The graph in Fig. 1 shows the mean penetration depth as a function of the photon arrival time, calculated as described in Ref [ 16]. for a homogeneous medium with a reduced scattering coefficient (μ s ' ) of 10 cm−10
The mean ± SD areas under the concentration-time curves during the 12-hour dosing interval (AUC0-Ts) were 195.6 ± 159.6 hour* μg/ml for serum and 88± 55 hour* μg/ml for CSF, with a mean penetration ratioAUC0-T CSF AUC0-T serum of 0.50.
In the WFS mean penetration depth was deeper than the median water depth in 10% of the coastal segments.
The mean proximodistal penetration of injectant for the PRP-MB group was 2.91 ± 0.32 cm (Table 2).
This was not significantly different from the MB group, which had a mean proximodistal penetration of 2.77 ± 0.40 cm (p = 0.80).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com