Sentence examples for mean peak speed from inspiring English sources

This random error reflected 22% of the mean, peak speed value between MDL-1 and the criterion (3.88 m·s−1).

Subsequently previous research has averaged speed data over 5-second intervals, to correspond with heart rate data, in order to obtain a "mean" peak speed [ 6– 8].

For MDL-5, the peak speed at each time stamp within a 5-second period is averaged to ultimately give a "mean" peak speed.

This was likely to be due to the fact that the "mean" peak speed revealed for MDL-5 was only 2.75 m·so1, so very little activity was registered at zones in excess of this speed.

This "mean" peak speed is always likely to underestimate the "true," instantaneous peak speed, since athletes would have to maintain the peak speed for 5 seconds when adopting the approach used by MDL-5.

This finding demonstrated that although MDL-1 slightly underestimated the mean peak speeds, there were individual instances where MDL-1 actually overestimated the peak speed in order to account for the random errors.

Bland-Altman plots were used to investigate the spread of the data with 95% LoA (presented as systematic bias ± random error) used to investigate the reliability of the MDL-1 and MDL-5 for distance covered, mean speed, peak speed, and the times spent and distances covered in arbitrary speed zones.

During each quarter the total distance covered, mean, and peak speeds were analysed from each device.

MDL data were averaged over both 1-second (MDL-1) and 5-second (MDL-5) intervals to calculate distance, mean, and peak speeds.

Although significant systematic bias was not evident for MDL-1 for the assessment of distance, mean and peak speeds, random errors ranging from 10 to 22% still existed.

The mean peak latency difference between the speed and accuracy conditions in MT+ corresponded well to the mean RT difference between these conditions across subjects (3.23 s +/− 1.28 SEM, and 2.97 s +/−.53 SEM, respectively, r = .71, df = 12, p<.01).