Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Spectral data presented represent mean peak intensity and a threshold signal-to-noise ratio of 30 (based upon the averaged spectra) was used for peptide peak definition.
The mean peak intensity of every pair of peaks is subsequently divided by the distance between these peaks, the distributions of these deviations are plotted in histograms and a heterogeneity factor (HF) is calculated.
The strongest suppressed band (present only in the control) amounted to 951% of the mean peak intensity.
The strongest band (present only in the treated sample) amounted to 2451% of the mean peak intensity calculated for all bands in the experiment.
Similar(56)
Metabolite levels were measured by calculating the mean peak intensities from gas chromatography (GC) TOF-MS.
The difference of mean peak intensities between healthy controls and ovarian cancer patients was analyzed by ANOVA, providing P values for each m/z peak.
Main outcome(s) and measures(s): Metabolite levels were measured calculating the mean peak intensities from gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
For the CRC and BC set, peak intensities from the triplicate (CRC) and duplicate (BC) analyses were averaged and mean peak intensities between groups compared by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U (MWU) test (p < 0.01 considered statistically significant).
The Biomarker Wizard compares the mean intensity of peak clusters, by sample group, using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test (two way comparisons) and generates P values that reflect probabilities that mean peak intensities at a given m/ z value differ by random chance.
Table 2 shows average peak intensity, mean intensity, duration, and antecedent rainfall for these three groups.
For the insertion site (n = 10 bovine knees), the mean peak autofluorescence intensity was found at the emission wavelength 390 nm and at the corresponding excitation wavelength 330 nm.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com