Sentence examples for mean pain interference from inspiring English sources

Mean pain interference score was 50.1 (SD = 11.1).

The mean pain interference score calculated from the BPI was significantly higher in patients with chronic pain than in patients without (6.8 ± 1.9 vs 5.9 ± 1.9, p < 0.05).

As expected, a significant linear relationship was observed in mean pain interference scores for patients classified according to empirically confirmed cut-offs for pain severity (Table  2).

The mean pain interference with function score was 5.0 (0–10 scale) overall, with 2.0 among mild, 5.1 among moderate, and 7.0 among severe.

As expected, a significant linear relationship was also observed in mean pain interference scores for patients classified according to empirically confirmed cut-offs for pain severity (Table  2).

From a previous study carried out at our site [ 23], change in mean pain interference CBPI score following 2-weeks of an NSAID was 1.4 (baseline = 2.9; after NSAID for 14d = 1.5) and the mean standard deviation was 1.2.

Mean BPI pain interference with daily activities and patient and investigator global evaluation scores also remained generally stable.

The mean BPI-SF pain interference score was 5.0 ± 2.6, and mean scores increased significantly as pain severity increased (mild, 2.0 ± 1.8; moderate, 5.1 ± 1.9; and severe, 7.0 ± 1.9; P < 0.0001, Figure 2B).

Baseline mean pain and sleep interference scores were comparable across treatment and age groups.

Uncontrolled symptoms could mean pain, embarrassment, faecal incontinence, interference with everyday activities and potential surgery.

This variable is calculated as the mean of ratings of pain interference with general activity, mood, walking, work (including housework), relations with others, sleep, and enjoyment of life.