Sentence examples for mean outcome at from inspiring English sources

We estimated the model: Y_{t} = beta_{0} + beta_{1} *Time_{t} + beta_{2} *Intervention + beta_{3} *TimeAfterIntervention + e_{t} where: Yt indicates the mean outcome at trimester t. β 0 estimates the baseline level of the outcome at the beginning of the study period (1st trimester of the overall study period).

The difference in the change from baseline (CFB) or least square mean outcome at follow-up was extracted for each outcome of interest or was calculated as the difference between the CFB (or least square mean at follow-up) for the active and placebo treatments.

During follow up, variations in mean outcomes at study baseline were compared against subsequent measurements using Student's paired t test for means, and McNemar's test for proportions.

Mean outcome data at each time point were compared for the main analyses.

The mean and standard deviation of the pre-intervention slope (-6 to 0 months) and post intervention slope (0 to 12 months) as well as the mean outcome measure at time 0 with 95% Confidence Interval will be estimated.

The (ensemble) mean outcomes for all sites are at least in qualitative agreement with estimates of declines prior to ∼1999 presented for the region [37].

Analysis of modeling output focused on mean radiant temperature and predicted mean vote outcomes at key points within each of the three areas.

Note one GP in Group 2 did not have baseline information (excluded from the denominator) Group 1 = Asthma Education + guidelines Group 2 = Guidelines only Group 3 = Alternative (ear, nose and throat) education only Diff = Difference between means, adjusted for outcome at baseline; Reference group is Group 1 n = Number of GPs SD = Standard deviation 95%CI = 95% Confidence Interval.

The robust design of deformation processes is stated as a two-criteria optimal design problem that attempts best mean properties of the outcome at minimum variability.

For secondary outcomes, linear mixed-effects models were used to obtain adjusted mean changes for each outcome at each assessment, with baseline age and sex, continuous time, and a change point at each postbaseline assessment included in the model.

We excluded from analyses two children who scored more than 3 SDs below the mean on the Bayley-III cognitive subscale at baseline (possible disability) and three children who scored more than 4 SDs below the mean on the same outcome at follow-up (extreme observations).