Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
The mean normalized score obtained by the patients on the PHPQoL-V.1 was 63.2 ±19.70.
We then compute the mean normalized score averaged over all training examples.
The mean normalized score was 50.88 (6.02), with a minimum of 34.71 and a maximum of 80.89.
Thus, we compare the mean normalized score of a given graph structure to the distribution of mean normalized scores for random graphs with the same number of edges and choose the graph structure with the most significant score given this distribution.
Similar(56)
Thus, (Q^{mathrm{rand}})s reported in Table 4 are the mean normalized modularity scores from the 100 randomly generated networks for each sub-domain with their respective variance.
Additional analysis for unknown novel motifs was conducted by Promzea (http://promzea.org) [ 26]. 1000 bp long promoter regions were analyzed and each predicted motif was provided with a mean normalized conditional probability (MNCP); a MNCP score greater than 1 indicates that the motif is more represented in the input data set compared to a random set of promoters/first introns [ 26].
Mean normalized change across semesters for MATE scores were significantly greater than zero (t = 7.648, df = 295, p < 0.001) and showed an average increase of 23%% (c M = 0.23 ± 0.53 N = 296).
The quantity z represents the distance between the raw score and the population mean normalized by standard deviation.
Number of touches, normalized score and power score mean values were compared among groups within the same gender in both sessions.
The intersession reliability of CKCUES Test was determined for number of touches, normalized score and power score using mean values of the last three repetitions between test and retest session.
Briefly, we used the following unweighted averaging scheme to calculate signature scores: First, individual datasets were mean normalized and gene expression for each gene in each sample was expressed as the log(10) ratio relative to the mean.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com