Sentence examples for mean net charge from inspiring English sources

The mean duration, the frequency and the mean net charge of step-like current deviations are presented in Table 1.

The CH plot is divided into two regions by a line (equation H = (R+1.151)/2.785, R: mean net charge, H: mean hydrophobicity) which best separates disordered (left side) and ordered (right side) proteins.

In the calculation, a normalized Kyte-Doolittle scale was used to obtain hydropathy values, while Arg, Lys, Glu and Asp residues were considered in calculating mean net charge values.

The CH plot is divided into two regions by a line, which corresponds to the equation H = (R+1.151)/2.785, where R is the mean net charge and H is the mean hydrophobicity.

The mean net charge (R) of a protein is defined as the absolute value of the difference between the number of positively and negatively charged residues at pH 7 divided by the total number of amino acid residues.

The structural disorder/order in the recombinant mouse and chimeric (mouse-MQP) amelogenin was examined using the mean net charge versus mean hydrophobicity plot that allows the binary classification of proteins [25].

Moreover, Henipavirus NTAIL and PNT are predicted to be disordered by the method based on the mean hydrophobicity/mean net charge ratio [45], whereas PMD and XD are predicted to be ordered (Fig. 3).

IDRs share some common sequence features such as low abundance of order-promoting and high abundance of disorder-promoting amino acids, low sequence complexity, poor sequence conservation, low mean hydrophobicity, high net charge, etc. (Dunker et al., 2001; Nishikawa et al., 2010; Romero et al., 2001; Shimizu et al., 2007; Uversky et al., 2000).

The fact that Q = 0 right at the interface between the SAM and 2P for system 7 means that there is no net charge transfer between the two layers.

Worth mentioning, is that the Dual-Ref-Set proteins have similar traits to those discussed for predicted dual-targeted proteins (low MitoProtII score, MTS parameters and net charge) with similar mean and median values.

However, these arguments have to be used with care and do not allow easy comparison between all cases (like BAX fragments against BCL-xL fragments), since the hydrophobic moment depends on the actual (unknown) structure and other factors, like the net charge or the mean hydrophobicity of the peptides may also play a role.