Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
In a previous study [5], we found that mean movement time was a better predictor than actual movement time.
Results of the 25 real-time feedback sessions are provided in Figure 7. Panels A C indicate hit rate, mean movement time, and mean endpoint error (measured as the difference between the formant space position at the end of the trial and the target formant position for that trial) as a function of block number, averaged across all 25 sessions.
The mean movement time of all subjects can be described by a negative cosine wave.
Mean movement time for the three magnifications, low, medium, and high, were 2476.0, 2266.1, and 2405.0 ms, respectively.
The r of the linear regression between mean movement time and index of difficulty was 0.40 (see Figure 6).
For the nine remaining trials, the mean movement time was calculated for each index of difficulty, pooled over all angle conditions and participants.
Similar(48)
The mean movement times in the practice phase are shown in Figure 2. Movement time on the first day was 2297 and 2904 ms for young and old participants, respectively, F 1,34) = 20.9, p<.01.
Average movement time was 930.1 ± 330.5 ms (mean ± SD).
Indeed, mean movement preparation time ranged from 660 to 900 ms across conditions (Supporting Text S1).
Fig. 4 Mean total movement time.
For each condition, we used the mean
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com