Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
Table 1 Welch two sample t test comparing mean of early versus late mean ONSD measurements using subject 21 as a cutoff Early ONSD mean (mm) Late ONSD mean (mm) p value Overall 3.69 3.68 0.884 Males 3.88 3.78 0.454 Females 3.52 3.55 0.869.
Table 7 The radiographic measurements of liner parameters at immediately after surgery (RBH, IL, SW) Parameter Mean (mm) SD (mm) RBH 4.48 1.51 IL 6.50 1.88 SW 10.32 2.29.
There are differences between the three types of masks but they are not significant Table 2 Conspicuity indices for experiment 2 A B C D N 13 13 13 13 Mean (mm) 97,8 169,4 156,8 134,2 SD (mm) 23,6 295% 31,7 31,4 95% conf.
Table 4 Statistics of landmarks error (in mm) using deformable group-wise registration of segmented CT images Landmark distance Min (mm) Mean (mm) Max (mm) Std (mm) Rabbit 1.01 2.66 4.50 1.74 Ferret 1.86 3.93 4.65 1.24 Mouse 0.23 2.52 6.0.23.62.
The range of 95% of all differences was 0.13 g/mol (0.45% of mean MM of both methods).
In general it has to be acknowledged that the observed signal differences were well below 1% of the mean MM (figure 4b) and are probably due to inaccuracies of both methods, as no systematic bias was evident.
Similar(46)
Total 0 Mean 3.2 mm (2 6 mm) Mean 2.4 mm (1 4 mm) Mean 10.1 (7–13) Mean 2.7 mm (1 5 mm) Total 9.6% of the sites; 30% of the implants Mean 0.55 mm (0 3 mm) Total 0 mb mesio-buccal, db disto-buccal, mo mesio-oral, do disto-oral, + present, − absent, f.p. fixed prosthetics, r.p. removable prosthetics, u.j.
*Values are means (mm. ±SD) of triplicate determination.
We found no significant difference in suture widening after cyclic load tests [conventional suture, mean 0.51 mm (S.D. 0.39 mm); hollow suture, mean 0.23 mm (S.D. 0.11 mm); and FWRM, mean 0.54 mm (S.D. 0.08 mm)].
All patients with active TB had a positive TST (mean 18 mm, range 10-24 mm).
In contrast, the plaque size of SH5190 R292K was not significantly affected in the presence (mean diameter=1.8 mm) or absence (mean diameter=1.8 mm) of 10µM oseltamivir carboxylate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com