Sentence examples for mean leaf water from inspiring English sources

Our predicted global mean leaf water δ18O at the sites of enrichment was 6.5‰.

Values for global mean leaf water δ18O as high as 8.7‰ have been reported [21].

This value is 2.1‰ greater than the global mean predicted by Farquhar et al. [7], for the sites of enrichment of 4.4‰, but in agreement with the global average leaf water δ18O means of 6.1 6.8‰ (also flux weighted) predicted to be necessary to explain the Dole effect [6].

Mean predawn leaf water potential reached −0.10, −0.49 and −0.75 MPa in the optimal, intermediate and low irrigation treatments respectively.

Reclaimed water treatments had higher mean leaf area (615.64 vs. 572.37 cm2) for fresh water under different water quantities (Table 7).

The main goal is to evaluate and compare the accuracy of these two approaches for estimating leaf water content by means of laboratory reflectance/transmittance measurements and for mapping leaf and canopy water content by using airborne Multispectral Infrared and Visible Imaging Spectrometer (MIVIS) data acquired over intensive poplar plantations (Ticino, Italy).

Also plotted are model output results from Hoffmann et al. [6] for the combined general circulation/biochemical models GISS/SLAVE and ECHAM/SILVAN (all model outputs represent un-weighted leaf water isotope ratio means).

The unweighted global leaf water annual average isoscapes at the sites of evaporation are shown in Figure 1 (means of the twelve monthly output grids for both δ18O and δ2H).

A) F-values of the analysis of variance and, B) means of soil water content (SWC), flag leaf water potential (ΨW), stomatal conductance (gs) and net photosynthetic rate (An) for each water treatment and for the wild-type and the mutant plants under control and water stress conditions.

The mean leaf length was 77.89 cm in plants irrigated with fresh water and 81.90 cm in those irrigated reclaimed water (Table 7).

Seasonal fluctuations in leaf water potential ranged widely between sites (Fig. 4), with very large ranges in mean midday water potential (Ψmidday) at the northern and western sites (−1.45 to −6.20 MPa and −1.42 to −4.89 MPa, respectively), while eastern sites, with less seasonal range in water availability, showed much diminished ranges (Ψmidday water potentials above −2.1 MPa).