Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(13)
Single density values on leaf surfaces showed high variation around the mean leaf deposition.
As shown in the figure, observed daily mean leaf deposition mirrored cumulative deposition rates.
Overall mean leaf deposition during the flowering period ranged from 54 to 478 n/cm2 (grains/cm2) depending on plant species and site, while daily mean leaf deposition values were as high as 2710 n/cm2.
As another example, mean leaf deposition close to the source is estimated to be 222 n/cm2 (326 n/cm2 × 0.68) for nettle.
Corresponding relation factors for maize and nettle mean leaf deposition, along with 90 and 95%% quantiles as indicators of the variation, are given in Table 2.
Fig. 3 Comparison of mean leaf deposition and its variability with PMF-based cumulative deposition and integrated deposition over the flowering period.
Similar(47)
We first examined trends in mean leaf-deposition values.
In this regard, the integrated deposition measured by the standardised PMF sampler reflects an average leaf deposition rate over the flowering period.
The relationship factor between PMF pollen deposition data and the mean leaf pollen deposition according to the EFSA Panel is thus 73 times lower than the factor of 0.68 that was based on field measurements, as documented in [3] (see Fig. 1).
Additionally, Additional file 1: Figure S7 shows this relationship on a linear scale for daily mean leaf pollen deposition values.
In this example, the resulting expected mean value of leaf deposition close to the source (in-field conditions) is estimated to be 434 n/cm2 (326 n/cm2 × 1.33).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com