Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Mean k estimates increased across epochs for all strains.
Similar(59)
For the parameters evaluated on site 3, 1) the mean S estimates of Green and Ampt, Kutílek and Krejča, and Philip were significantly lower than the mean S estimates of Brutsaert and Swartzendruber, and 2) the mean Ks estimates of Kutílek and Krejča, and of Philip, were significantly lower than the mean Ks estimates of Brutsaert, Swartzendruber and Horton.
The overall mean Ks values estimated using the modified Nei and Gojobori algorithm [ 36] with Jukes-Cantor correction [ 37] are 0.12, 0.150 and 0.11 for the TIR, NBS and LRR domains, respectively.
The estimated mean K m of CmPT1 was 35.2 μM Pi, as determined from three independent experiments.
Based on the parentage assignments, we estimated the mean (k) and variance (Vk) of reproductive success among parents of a same sex.
Estimation from outbreak datasets does not increase the bias of k estimates, but can add significant upward bias to estimates of the mean.
This duplication's average divergence (mean K I = 0.00275; mean K S = 0.00447) is 2.2 3.6-fold 2.2 3.6-fold that expected divergence (≈ 0.010, smallerve) for human-chimpanzee comparisons, which corresponds thann esthattexpectedgence time of between 1.7 andivergence
The mean Ks values and the estimated dates for all segmental duplication events corresponding to WRKY genes are listed in Table 2.
The mean Ks values and the estimated dates for all segmental duplication events corresponding to expansin genes are listed in Table 3.
When using complete pooling, GEBVs of all individuals in the test set were predicted from the posterior means of marker effects u k estimated from the joint data set with model (4).
The timing of segmental duplication events can be estimated by computing mean Ks values for all anchor points located in the corresponding syntenic block (Paterson et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2012), and all the Ks values were parsed from PGDD syntenic data.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com