Suggestions(2)
Exact(3)
The inner slopes of the three levels of gorges have mean inclinations of 35.6°, 37.7°, and 39.8°, and steepen from the higher to the lower inner gorges.
Mean inclinations of the high-temperature component for cores AVL1 and AVL2 were found to be 35.9° ± 4.3° and 45.3° ± 4.2°, respectively.
Mean inclinations of the low-temperature component for cores AVL1 and AVL2 were found to be 51.6° ±4.8° and 51.9° ± 2.9°, respectively.
Similar(57)
First, the mean inclination of each site was calculated between 0 and 100 ka (Table 1).
The mean inclination of the axis connecting the apex and the cusp tip relative to the true vertical line was 12.1°.
The mean inclination of Kmin between depths of 67.85 and 66.11 m was 74°, and the dip of the foliation plane formed by Kmax and Kint is therefore estimated to be 16°.
In this regard, we would point out that the sample used in this study had a mean age of 25 years and that the mean inclination of the eminence of the study groups was 50° with a standard deviation of ±8°, similar to the values defined by Ricketts [24].
For each core, the amount of inclination deviation of the high-temperature component from the low-temperature component is calculated the mean inclination of the high-temperature components of cores AVL1 and AVL2 is 15.7° ± 6.4° and 6.6° ± 5.1°, respectively, shallower than that of the corresponding low-temperature components.
The acetabular orientation using Wrightington cup orientation software had a mean inclination of 50 (34 75) degrees and mean anteversion of 12 (2.3 39) degrees.
Merle et al have used anatomic values to represent this, which may explain their relatively higher mean inclination of 62.1° (sd 7.46) compared with other studies (Atkinson) and our observation of inclination of 51.4° (sd 7.2).
Two years following implantation, the mean inclination of the acetabular component was 41° (range, 35°-61°) in the resurfacing group and 45,5° (range, 28°-68°) in the THA group (Table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com