Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
The item impact was determined from the proportion of patients who identified it as important, and the mean importance score [ranging from 1 (least) to 5 (greatest)] attributed to this item (impact score = frequency cited × importance).
The impact of items was calculated based on the proportion of patients who indicated each as important, multiplied by the mean importance score [ranging from 1 (least) to 5 (greatest)] indicated for this item (impact score = frequency cited × importance) [ 15].
The current treatment modality (existing transplant or waiting list) significantly influenced the mean importance score for some factors (Table 2).
Unemployed patients rated the importance of performing paid work with a mean score of 3.4 (2.3) and employed patients' mean importance score was 6.7 (0.6.7
Age of respondents and non-English speaking background did not significantly influence the mean importance score of any of the other factors identified.
The overall mean importance score (8.8) and availability score (6.1) for the 2008 state level staff were the lowest among all four groups.
Similar(45)
Mean importance scores were calculated.
Attribute importance scores were calculated for each individual separately and then averaged for mean importance scores.
In Table 2 the mean importance scores and variances of the different quality indicators are presented.
The variation between the countries for each aspect is illustrated in table 3 by mean importance scores for all aspects.
The mean importance scores were calculated for each topic, and the top ten priorities are presented in Table 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com