Sentence examples for mean implicit time from inspiring English sources

The mean implicit time for mfERG1 New Amp was 31.40 ± 0.90 ms and the mean implicit time for mfERG2 was 31.30 ± 0.87 ms.

The mean implicit time of subjects on mfERG1 Old Amp was 28.80 ± 0.91 ms and the mean implicit time on mfERG2 was 31.30 ± 0.87 ms.

The mean implicit time difference between the two amplifiers was 2.5 ms.

In contrast the mean implicit time was similar to control eyes.

There was a mean implicit time difference of 2.5 ms between the amplifiers but conversion to Z-scores improved their agreement.

The ± 0.86 Z-score confidence interval for mean implicit time corresponds to ± 0.73 ms, which is less than ± 1 real-time signal sample in our recordings.

For implicit time, the mean local difference between the two instruments was 0.01 Z-score.

The 2.5 ms mean difference in implicit times between the two amplifiers also occurred locally, but with conversion to Z-scores, the amplifiers had good local agreement for all simultaneous recordings.

The results showed that the mean (of all 103 local response measurements) implicit time Z-scores differed from 0.04 to 0.76 Z-scores with a mean difference of 0.36 ± 0.28 Z-scores.

The novel time-marching approach relies on decoupled, implicit time integration, that is, the five mean-flow equations are solved separately from the seven Reynolds-stress closure equations.

Conversion of the data into implicit time Z-scores produced an even smaller mean difference between the instruments, making them more comparable (Fig.  5c).