Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Those in the highest income group (£40,000 + pa) had average implicit liking scores for fruit that were 0.49 units (95% CI 0.04 0.94) higher than those in the lowest income group (Up to £15,500 pa) (mean implicit liking score 0.58, s.d. 0.63), i.e. those in the highest income group had higher implicit liking for fruit compared to those in the lowest income group.
Similar(59)
Lower SES males reported eating less fruit and lower implicit liking of fruit.
The mean implicit time for mfERG1 New Amp was 31.40 ± 0.90 ms and the mean implicit time for mfERG2 was 31.30 ± 0.87 ms.
The mean implicit time of subjects on mfERG1 Old Amp was 28.80 ± 0.91 ms and the mean implicit time on mfERG2 was 31.30 ± 0.87 ms.
Participants were randomly assigned to an implicit liking task (Single Category Implicit Association Task) for one food category.
2 Analyses on implicit liking comprised just those participants randomised to the fruit category (n = 229).
Berridge and Robinson 22 refer to these expressions as objective affective reactions or implicit affect and to the psychological process as implicit liking.
The mean implicit time difference between the two amplifiers was 2.5 ms.
In contrast the mean implicit time was similar to control eyes.
For analyses examining occupational group, gender did not reach significance as a predictor of implicit liking, and no clear linear associations (main effects or interactions) were observed for occupational group and implicit liking.
In implicit liking analyses, results (for income and education) reflected patterning in consumption, with lower SES and male participants liking fruit less.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com