Mean height (p < 0.0001), DBH (p < 0.0001), and biomass of individual trees (p < 0.0001) were lower on primary skid trails than in non-trafficked areas.
No statistically significant differences in the volume (p = 0.35) or mean height (p = 0.24) of adhesive remnants were found (ANOVA rank Kruskal-Wallis test) between the groups of teeth cleaned using different tools.
The results concerning adhesive remnants height and volume after orthodontic clean-up using three different tools have been presented in Table 1.> No statistically significant differences in the volume (p = 0.35) or mean height (p = 0.24) of adhesive remnants were found (ANOVA rank Kruskal-Wallis test) between the groups of teeth cleaned using the various tools.
On the other hand, after a mean follow-up period of 1.4 ± 0.8 years, 9 patients (group 2) had acceleration of bone maturation and deterioration of their predicted FH (from 162.1 ± 6.2 cm to 155.3 ± 5.6 cm; P <.01), which was at that time significantly lower than their target height (P <.05) (mean target height = 159.8 ± 4.6 cm).
Moreover, the in vivo results for noninfected soil showed that the presence of ACTA1551 produced plants of statistically significantly higher mean values of weight and height (P ≤ 0.001) compared to the positive controls (untreated tomato seeds planted into noninfected soil).
In our study, survivors showed at FH a significant mean height loss of – 0.42 SDS (p 0.000) compared to height SDS at diagnosis and, analyzing height-SDS adjusted according to TH, the loss in SDS from sT to FH still persisted (-0.30; p 0.000).
Three factors that were potentially confounding factors for outcome of aseptic component loosening were an increased (p < 0.01) percentage of women, a lower (p = 0.03) mean weight, and a lower (p < 0.01) mean height.
In terms of comparison between flexion and extension, the mean height changed 1.22 mm (28.3 %), (P < 0.001) (Table 3).
The RH analysis was repeated without the two patients which were found to have RH atrophy, and all comparisons remained non-significant (mean FA p = 0.347, peak height p = 0.132, peak location p = 0.101).
The comparison between patients and controls revealed no significant difference on the RH for mean FA (p = 0.228), peak height (p = 0.070) and peak location (p = 0.064), while the LH comparison revealed a highly significant difference for all three histogram parameters with p < 0.001.
Between 1995 and 2005, mean age decreased (69.1 to 66.3 years; P < 0.001), mean diabetes duration increased (6.6 to 7.0 years; P = 0.047), and mean weight increased (81.1 to 86.1 kg; P < 0.001), whereas mean height was comparable between both surveys.
