Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Factor three " hearing-related problems" was associated with the numeric rating loudness, the mean hearing level, and the auditory subscore of the TQ.
The mean hearing level (dB HL) was calculated by averaging all thresholds for both ears measured in PTA from 125 Hz to 8 kHz.
Similar(58)
No differences were found in mean hearing levels between the randomized and nonrandomized children: in both the randomized and nonrandomized children ventilation tubes improved the hearing level, especially after 6 months.
Farm machine factory workers showed a significantly higher level of hearing loss than the firefighters when the mean hearing levels at 2, 3, and 4 kHz were compared (p < 0.0001; Table 3 and Figure 2).
In the case of farm machine factory workers, mean hearing levels were over 25 dB despite being exposed to a mean noise level below the current accepted threshold of 85 dBA according to environmental noise exposure monitoring.
Results: The mean hearing impairment level was 95.5±13.86 dB for the right ear, and 92.25±14.3 dB for the left.
Eight participants in the HI group had interaural asymmetry >20 dB. Figure 2 shows the mean (and SD) hearing level for both groups.
The same was done for the mean HF-hearing level (dB HL) for all frequencies from 10 kHz to 16 kHz.
20 The hearing scores were computed as pure-tone average on the worse ear for three independent mean values: (1) low-frequency hearing level (250 and 500 Hz), (2) medium-frequency hearing level (1000 and 2000 Hz) and (3) high-frequency hearing level (3000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 Hz).
Mean hearing thresholds were defined as: (i) low-frequency hearing level (250 and 500 Hz, thresholds averaged over frequencies and both ears); (ii) mid-frequency hearing level (1000 and 2000 Hz); and (iii) high-frequency hearing level (3000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 Hz).
In the first models, the mean hearing thresholds for low-, mid- and high-frequency hearing level were entered together with age (per year).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com