Sentence examples for mean haemoglobin value from inspiring English sources

Exact(5)

At study entry, mean haemoglobin value was 12.5 g dl−1 (standard error of the mean±0.07 g dl−1).

The final volume of the pressurized circuit was 819 ± 82 mL with a mean haemoglobin value of 70 ± 2 g/L.

The mean haemoglobin value at 12 months before readmission to dialysis was 11.6 g/dL [7.2 mmol/L] in the 2001 cohort when compared with 12.3 g/dL [7.6 mmol/L] in the 2009 cohort.

Considering these indications, the mean haemoglobin value of the study population (12.5 g dl−1), and the response rate of patients stratified by haemoglobin levels, the haemoglobin cutoff to discriminate anaemic vs nonanaemic patients in this study was determined to be 12.0 g dl−1.

In agreement with other studies [ 17, 30– 32], the prevalence of anaemia was high but there was a decrease over the 8-year study period, with a mean haemoglobin value of 11.6 g/dL [7.2 mmol/L] in 2001 versus 12.3 g/dL [7.6 mmol/L] in 2009 at −12 months and 9.6 g/dL [6.0 mmol/L] in 2001 versus 10.6 g/dL [6.6 mmol/L] in 2009 at the time of restarting dialysis.

Similar(55)

Mean haemoglobin values rose in both groups throughout the study (10.5 g/dL to 11.1 g/dL for FMP1/AS02; 10.3 g/dL to 10.9 g/dL for Rabipur®).

The mean haemoglobin values were normal, but anaemia was present in 673 patiens (38%).

In the CONDOR trial the mean haemoglobin values at baseline were 13.6 (s.d. 1.1) for both treatment arms (Table 2).

In the CLASS trial, the mean haemoglobin values at the onset of the study were 13.6 (s.d. 1.3) in the celecoxib and diclofenac treatment arms, respectively.

Interestingly the difference between the two trials is not readily explained by a difference in the mean haemoglobin values for the two populations at baseline.

We subsequently compared the blood cell counts and haemoglobin concentration between both groups and found that the latter was statistically significant (mean haemoglobin concentration of cluster 1 = 13.05 g/l vs. mean of cluster 2 = 11.41 g/l, P value  = 0.0008, Supporting Information S1).

Show more...

Ludwig, your English writing platform

Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.

Student

Used by millions of students, scientific researchers, professional translators and editors from all over the world!

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

Get started for free

Unlock your writing potential with Ludwig

Letters

Most frequent sentences: